fix(linter): Fix jest/expect-expect rule docs.

[connorshea]

Fixes #16491.

The default value here is a bit weird so I had to adjust the docs to make it clear that there's a distinction with jest vs vitest.

Generated docs:

## Configuration

This rule accepts a configuration object with the following properties:

### additionalTestBlockFunctions

type: `string[]`

default: `[]`

An array of function names that should also be treated as test blocks.

### assertFunctionNames

type: `string[]`

default: `["expect"]`

A list of function names that should be treated as assertion functions.

NOTE: The default value is `["expect"]` for Jest and
`["expect", "expectTypeOf", "assert", "assertType"]` for Vitest.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR fixes the documentation for the jest/expect-expect rule to clarify that it has different default values for assertion function names depending on whether it's used with Jest or Vitest. The fix addresses a documentation gap where users weren't aware of the framework-specific defaults.

Key Changes:

• Added comprehensive documentation explaining that assertFunctionNames defaults to ["expect"] for Jest and ["expect", "expectTypeOf", "assert", "assertType"] for Vitest
• Used #[schemars(rename)] and #[schemars(skip)] attributes to properly expose only the unified config option to users while hiding internal implementation details
• Corrected reference from .eslintrc.json to .oxlintrc.json in configuration examples

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #16550 will not alter performance

_{Comparing fix-expect-expect (4b2262a) with main (514c724)}

Summary

✅ 4 untouched
⏩ 41 skipped¹

Footnotes

1. 41 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[camc314]

Merge activity

• Dec 7, 2:30 PM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Dec 7, 2:30 PM UTC: camc314 added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Dec 7, 2:35 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue.