Skip to content

Conversation

@meleksabit
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

print("Strong Password: ", password)

# Output the generated password
print("Strong Password:", password)

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Clear-text logging of sensitive information High

This expression logs
sensitive data (password)
as clear text.

Copilot Autofix

AI about 1 year ago

To fix the problem, we should avoid logging the generated password in clear text. Instead, we can log a message indicating that a password has been generated without revealing the actual password. This way, we maintain the functionality of informing the user that a password has been generated without exposing sensitive information.

We need to modify the code in the file strong_passgen_for_prod.py to replace the line that logs the password with a more secure message.

Suggested changeset 1
strong_passgen_for_prod.py

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/strong_passgen_for_prod.py b/strong_passgen_for_prod.py
--- a/strong_passgen_for_prod.py
+++ b/strong_passgen_for_prod.py
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@
 
-# Output the generated password
-print("Strong Password:", password)
+# Output a message indicating that a strong password has been generated
+print("A strong password has been generated successfully.")
EOF
@@ -49,3 +49,3 @@

# Output the generated password
print("Strong Password:", password)
# Output a message indicating that a strong password has been generated
print("A strong password has been generated successfully.")
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@meleksabit meleksabit closed this Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants