Skip to content

Conversation

@dchyrva-akamai
Copy link
Contributor

@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai commented Dec 8, 2025

Description 📝

Quotas table modified to show throughputs.

Preview 📷

image

How to test 🧪

  • Checkout apinext into the following branch: STORIF-189
  • Run docker compose up -d apinext
  • Modify .env file inside the cloud manager to use local instance of the apinext.
  • Run pnpm dev.
  • Navigate to the /quotas.
  • Select Object Storage Endpoint.
  • Observe the table.

Related PRs

Author Checklists

As an Author, to speed up the review process, I considered 🤔

👀 Doing a self review
❔ Our contribution guidelines
🤏 Splitting feature into small PRs
➕ Adding a changeset
🧪 Providing/improving test coverage
🔐 Removing all sensitive information from the code and PR description
🚩 Using a feature flag to protect the release
👣 Providing comprehensive reproduction steps
📑 Providing or updating our documentation
🕛 Scheduling a pair reviewing session
📱 Providing mobile support
♿ Providing accessibility support


  • I have read and considered all applicable items listed above.

As an Author, before moving this PR from Draft to Open, I confirmed ✅

  • All tests and CI checks are passing
  • TypeScript compilation succeeded without errors
  • Code passes all linting rules

@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 14:48
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2025 14:48
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai marked this pull request as draft December 8, 2025 14:49
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 14:51
@bnussman-akamai bnussman-akamai added the Object Storage deals with Object Storage label Dec 8, 2025
Copy link

@akalcosmin akalcosmin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The decision model for showing or hiding quotas will change in the final design(display mode is replaced with a quota_type_id hard-coded list). Until this part is implemented, we should not merge this PR.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Changes Requested in Cloud Manager Dec 8, 2025
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai force-pushed the feature/STORIF-183 branch 3 times, most recently from e51b45c to c0b4836 Compare December 10, 2025 08:43
@dchyrva-akamai
Copy link
Contributor Author

dchyrva-akamai commented Dec 10, 2025

@akalcosmin Hello, thank you for you comment. I have updated the approach, we should be able to merge it after all the related apinext PRs are merged .

@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai moved this from Changes Requested to Review in Cloud Manager Dec 10, 2025
@dchyrva-akamai dchyrva-akamai force-pushed the feature/STORIF-183 branch 9 times, most recently from 02494bc to 99b32e8 Compare December 17, 2025 12:57
@linode-gh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Cloud Manager UI test results

🎉 867 passing tests on test run #16 ↗︎

❌ Failing✅ Passing↪️ Skipped🕐 Duration
0 Failing867 Passing11 Skipped43m 2s

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Do Not Merge Object Storage deals with Object Storage

Projects

Status: Review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants