style(studio): distinguish open-section body from header background#2369
Open
vanceingalls wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
Collaborator
Author
This was referenced Jul 13, 2026
vanceingalls
force-pushed
the
studio-flat-15-review-fixes
branch
from
77e59e8 to
65ad878
Compare
vanceingalls
force-pushed
the
07-13-style_studio_distinguish_open-section_body_from_header_background
branch
from
0cc7daf to
353310a
Compare
Add panel.bg-inset token (#121214) and inset shadow to open-group body for visual separation from the header row.
vanceingalls
force-pushed
the
07-13-style_studio_distinguish_open-section_body_from_header_background
branch
from
353310a to
cdd5083
Compare
Open
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Brief description of the change.
Why
Why is this change needed?
How
How was this implemented? Any notable design decisions?
Test plan
How was this tested?