Skip to content

refactor(test-benchmark): address spec diverge in devnet#3062

Closed
LouisTsai-Csie wants to merge 26 commits into
ethereum:devnets/glamsterdam/6from
LouisTsai-Csie:refactor-benchmark-spec
Closed

refactor(test-benchmark): address spec diverge in devnet#3062
LouisTsai-Csie wants to merge 26 commits into
ethereum:devnets/glamsterdam/6from
LouisTsai-Csie:refactor-benchmark-spec

Conversation

@LouisTsai-Csie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🗒️ Description

🔗 Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

✅ Checklist

  • All: Ran fast static checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:
    just static
  • All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
  • All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
  • Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.
  • Tests: For PRs implementing a missed test case, update the post-mortem document to add an entry the list.
  • Ported Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests or tests/static have been assigned @ported_from marker.

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

spencer-tb and others added 26 commits June 19, 2026 15:10
…thereum#2972)

Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <57262657+SamWilsn@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mario Vega <11726710+marioevz@users.noreply.github.com>
* feat(spec, specs): EIP-7997 - Spec and basic tests

* feat(spec-specs): EIP 7997 - More tests

* bugfix(specs): Add logic to add 0x12 as a special contract outside the
precompile range

* feat(tests): 7997 - add a check at the transition, adds tests for prewarming, CALLCODE, and giving it a balance via SELFDESTRUCT

* fix: address PR feedback

* feat(spec): Use Arachnid create2 contract

* feat(specs, spec-test): Remove unneeded code

* feat(spec-tests): Remove unneeded tests

* feat(test-specs): Add sstore metadata for gas pricing

* fix(test-specs): Remove sstore metadata

* feat(test-specs): Add Arachnid contract to system contracts

* feat(test-specs): Add a BAL test, large initcode test, and an ef prefix test

* fix(test-specs): remove unneeded pre_alloc_mutable decorators

* Add Amsterdam config to test_execute_eth_config

* fix: Uses storage.store_next and mark valid_from EIP7997 instead of Amsterdam

* fix: don't hardcode gas values, call_opcode parametrization

* fix: Remove Factory predeploy from system contracts

* fix: Remove explicit set of gas_limit

* lint

* Whitespace
…reum#2842)

* feat: implement eip 8246

* tests: enhance eip 8246 coverage

* refactor: resolve failing selfdestruct scenario

* chore: fix linting issue

* fix(specs): Remove all references to burn logs

* fix(tests): Fix remaining tests

* chore: rename function

---------

Co-authored-by: marioevz <marioevz@gmail.com>
…reum#3031)

* feat(tests): EIP-8037 code-deposit state gas exact-fit boundary

Pin the code-deposit state gas charge at its exact-fit gas boundary. A
CREATE transaction deploys code via RETURN(0, code_size); after the init
code returns, code deposit charges keccak regular gas from gas_left then
code_size * COST_PER_STATE_BYTE state gas, reservoir first and spilling
into gas_left.

test_code_deposit_state_gas_exact_fit_boundary sets the transaction gas
so the deposit charge lands exactly at the available gas (the contract
deploys) or one gas short (the deposit halts, NEW_ACCOUNT is refilled,
and no code is deployed). The reservoir_funded case uses code_size =
MAX_CODE_SIZE so the deposit exceeds the EIP-7825 cap and is drawn
reservoir first (the shortfall reduces the reservoir; an over-cap halt
bills exactly the cap); the gas_left_spill case uses an in-cap gas limit
so the deposit spills wholly from gas_left. The scaling tests vary the
size but assert success only, leaving this boundary unpinned.
)

Co-authored-by: danceratopz <danceratopz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: marioevz <marioevz@gmail.com>
…thereum#3044)

EIP-8246 removes the `SELFDESTRUCT` balance burn, which changes the
same-transaction self-destruct-to-self outcome. Gate the affected
expectations in `test_selfdestruct_gas.py` on `fork.is_eip_enabled(8246)`
so the test holds on forks with and without EIP-8246:

- Pre-EIP-8246: The originator balance is burnt (a `Burn` log) and the
  same-transaction-created account is deleted.
- EIP-8246 onwards: The burn is removed, so the self-send is a no-op; the
  balance stays in the (emptied) originator and no log is emitted.

`burn_log` is imported lazily in the pre-EIP-8246 branch because EIP-8246
deletes the helper from the EIP-7708 spec. The charged gas is unchanged,
so `cumulative_gas_used` is asserted identically on both sides.
`test_mixed_validity_multi_auth_receipt_gas` modelled the old refund rule
where only the valid authorization is refunded. The EIP-8037 update for
ethereum/EIPs#11715 (implemented on this branch in `vm/eoa_delegation.py`)
refunds every authorization: Each returns `NEW_ACCOUNT` on the state
channel and `ACCOUNT_WRITE` on the regular channel, and the invalid tuple
is fully refunded, so it additionally returns `AUTH_BASE` on the state
channel.

Update the expected-gas computation accordingly, deriving `AUTH_BASE` from
the per-authorization state intrinsic. The asserted `cumulative_gas_used`
drops from `0x47704` to `0x1011e`, matching the implementation.

This fixup is devnet6-only: It can only land where the EIP-8037 update
exists, which is not yet the case on `eips/amsterdam/eip-2780-8038`.
…OCK_ACCESS_LIST (ethereum#3046)

ethrex correctly rejects an EIP-7928 block whose BAL contains a SlotChanges
with an empty slot_changes list, returning INVALID with the message
"Block access list storage_changes slot <slot> for account <addr> has an empty
change set". The EthrexExceptionMapper already recognizes the sibling
validate_ordering() messages (not-in-strictly-ascending-order,
storage_changes-and-storage_reads) but was missing this one, so consume's
strict exception matching reports test_bal_invalid_empty_slot_changes
[unrelated_slot|demoted_noop] as failing even though ethrex's consensus
behavior is correct. Add the missing alternative to the INVALID_BLOCK_ACCESS_LIST
regex.
…zero balance precompile (ethereum#3048)

* fix(amsterdam): charge NEW_ACCOUNT for value transfer to empty precompile

EIP-2780 charges the NEW_ACCOUNT state cost when a transaction
transfers value to a recipient that is empty per EIP-161. The
top-frame charge previously carved out precompile recipients, but
neither EIP-2780 nor EIP-161 authorizes that exemption:

- EIP-2780 does not mention precompiles; its rule keys solely on
  "empty per EIP-161 and tx.value > 0".
- EIP-161 defines empty structurally (no code, zero nonce, zero
  balance) with no precompile exception, so an unfunded precompile
  is empty and is created by the value transfer like any other
  account.

Remove the `recipient_is_precompile` carve-out from the top-frame
charge so an empty precompile receiving value pays NEW_ACCOUNT,
drop the matching special-case from the testing framework's
`transaction_top_frame_state_gas`, and rewrite
`test_value_move_to_precompiles` to assert the charge fires for the
not-funded precompile while a pre-funded (alive) precompile remains
exempt by virtue of being non-empty.

Co-authored-by: danceratopz <danceratopz@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3d7a09c)
(cherry picked from commit bcfeb3c)
(cherry picked from commit d2bc90d)
(cherry picked from commit 52f72de)
(cherry picked from commit 4698103)
(cherry picked from commit 1582cc3)
@spencer-tb spencer-tb force-pushed the devnets/glamsterdam/6 branch from 4bc0fc6 to d0338f5 Compare July 2, 2026 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants