Skip to content

Conversation

@wxtim
Copy link
Member

@wxtim wxtim commented Nov 26, 2025

Closes cylc/cylc-flow#5937 and cylc/cylc-flow#3441
Requires cylc/cylc-flow#7068 to work correctly (else cylc review is labelled a dead-end).

Sort of requires cylc/release-actions#136 To run coverage later.

Check List

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md and added my name as a Code Contributor.
  • Contains logically grouped changes (else tidy your branch by rebase).
  • Does not contain off-topic changes (use other PRs for other changes).
  • Applied any dependency changes to both setup.cfg (and conda-environment.yml if present).
  • Tests are included (or explain why tests are not needed).

Test working can be demonstrated by adding this to CI.

          pip uninstall cylc-flow -y
          pip install git+https://github.com/wxtim/[email protected]

https://github.com/cylc/cylc-uiserver/actions/runs/19763672460/job/56631293468

  • Changelog entry included if this is a change that can affect users
  • Cylc-Doc pull request opened if required at cylc/cylc-doc/pull/XXXX.
  • If this is a bug fix, PR should be raised against the relevant ?.?.x branch.

@wxtim wxtim marked this pull request as draft November 26, 2025 15:52
@wxtim wxtim mentioned this pull request Nov 28, 2025
8 tasks
@wxtim wxtim force-pushed the feat.cylc-review branch 5 times, most recently from befa4f2 to f35b60c Compare December 4, 2025 10:19
@wxtim wxtim marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 11:50
@wxtim wxtim force-pushed the feat.cylc-review branch 4 times, most recently from b528eea to 37dc894 Compare December 5, 2025 10:52
@ChrisPaulBennett
Copy link
Contributor

I just had a look at the macOS failures to see I could offer any help........Ooooof.
I'm starting to think that supporting macOS really isn't worth it....

@wxtim wxtim force-pushed the feat.cylc-review branch 5 times, most recently from 37ff40f to f4fc283 Compare December 8, 2025 11:20
@wxtim
Copy link
Member Author

wxtim commented Dec 8, 2025

Tests will fail until other branches merged - this commit's tests shows that they should pass after those are merged.

ChrisPaulBennett

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ChrisPaulBennett ChrisPaulBennett self-requested a review December 15, 2025 09:32
Copy link
Contributor

@ChrisPaulBennett ChrisPaulBennett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image Something is not right with the sorting of `last active time`. It appears to be backwards

@wxtim wxtim force-pushed the feat.cylc-review branch 2 times, most recently from a8c9dae to d960a8a Compare December 16, 2025 13:15
@wxtim
Copy link
Member Author

wxtim commented Dec 16, 2025

Have fixed.

@wxtim wxtim changed the title add Cylc Review Add Cylc Review (from Cylc 7) Dec 16, 2025
fix sort order

fixed small bug in broadcast states qurey

fix test
@wxtim wxtim mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2025
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cylc review: port to Cylc 8

2 participants