added ghost user

[raphael-goetz]

Resolves: #923

[github-actions]

GitLab Pipeline Action

General information

Link to pipeline: https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2636379119

Status: Passed
Duration: 6 minutes

Job summaries

rspec: [cloud]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/15077030002/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2636379119/test_report
Finished in 27.9 seconds (files took 11.2 seconds to load)
1586 examples, 0 failures, 3 pending
Line Coverage: 93.21% (5973 / 6408)
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:17.286 (51.64% of total time)

rspec: [ee]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/15077030001/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2636379119/test_report
Finished in 28.74 seconds (files took 12.12 seconds to load)
1550 examples, 0 failures, 3 pending
Line Coverage: 93.4% (5820 / 6231)
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:17.694 (49.03% of total time)

rspec: [ce]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/15077030000/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/2636379119/test_report
Finished in 27.77 seconds (files took 13.51 seconds to load)
1500 examples, 0 failures, 3 pending
Line Coverage: 93.0% (5644 / 6069)
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:17.127 (48.47% of total time)

docs:preview

Documentation preview available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/telescopium/-/jobs/15077080342/artifacts/out/index.html

rubocop

933 files inspected, no offenses detected

[Taucher2003]

We need to think about this a bit more. We will need more internal users (Crater for example needs one) so we should build it in a way that can be easily extended. I think a user_type enum with values like regular and ghost would be a better implementation rather than basing it on usernames. This makes it easily extendable and we are more free on the usernames on conflicts if we add an internal user after the release.