feat: add SPEC-29 Phase 3 bucket snapshot CLI commands #476

phernandez · 2025-12-25T00:52:11Z

Summary

Add CLI commands for managing Tigris bucket snapshots (SPEC-29 Phase 3)
Implement bm cloud snapshot command group with create, list, delete, show, browse subcommands
Implement bm cloud restore command for restoring files from snapshots

Related PR: https://github.com/basicmachines-co/basic-memory-cloud/pull/346

Commands Added

Snapshot management:

bm cloud snapshot create "before major refactor"  # Create snapshot
bm cloud snapshot list                            # List snapshots
bm cloud snapshot delete <id>                     # Delete snapshot
bm cloud snapshot show <id>                       # Show details
bm cloud snapshot browse <id> --prefix notes/     # Browse contents

Restore from snapshot:

bm cloud restore notes/project.md --snapshot <id>  # Restore file
bm cloud restore research/ --snapshot <id>         # Restore folder

Test plan

All 25 new CLI tests pass
Existing cloud authentication tests still pass
Type checking passes (pyright)
Linting passes (ruff)
Manual testing with cloud API (requires subscription)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Implement CLI commands for managing Tigris bucket snapshots: Snapshot commands (bm cloud snapshot): - create: Create a new bucket snapshot with description - list: List all bucket snapshots with pagination - delete: Delete a snapshot (with confirmation) - show: Show detailed snapshot information - browse: Browse snapshot contents with optional prefix filter Restore command (bm cloud restore): - Restore files or folders from a snapshot - Shows preview of files before restore - Supports --force flag to skip confirmation All commands: - Handle subscription requirement errors - Integrate with existing cloud authentication - Include comprehensive test coverage (25 tests) Related: SPEC-29 Tigris Bucket Versioning Phase 3 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: phernandez <[email protected]>

github-actions · 2025-12-25T00:52:23Z

Claude finished @phernandez's task in 1m 47s —— View job

PR Review Complete ✅

I've reviewed the SPEC-29 Phase 3 implementation against Basic Memory's coding standards and team checklist. Overall, this is excellent work with clean code, comprehensive tests, and good user experience. Below are my findings.

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Excellent

✅ Python 3.12+ type annotations: Proper use of Optional, type hints throughout
✅ Typer conventions: Clean command structure, proper options/arguments
✅ 100-character line limit: All files comply
✅ No commented-out code: Clean implementation
✅ Error handling: Comprehensive exception handling with proper exit codes
✅ Async patterns: Consistent use of asyncio.run() pattern

Observations

ℹ️ Import order: All files follow standard lib → third-party → local imports correctly
ℹ️ Naming conventions: Consistent snake_case for functions, proper command naming

✅ Testing & Documentation

Excellent Test Coverage

✅ 25 comprehensive unit tests covering:
- Success cases (create, list, delete, show, browse, restore)
- Error cases (404, 403, 500, API errors)
- Edge cases (empty results, many files, user cancellation)
- Input normalization (leading slash handling)
- Output formatting (truncation for large file lists)
✅ Proper mocking: Good use of unittest.mock with Mock and AsyncMock
✅ Test organization: Clear test classes grouping related functionality

Documentation

✅ Docstrings: All commands have clear docstrings with examples
✅ Help text: Good option/argument descriptions for CLI users
⚠️ Missing: CLAUDE.md not updated with new snapshot commands (see checklist item below)

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

Excellent Patterns

✅ Atomic operations: Each command does one thing well
✅ Consistent error handling: Uses CloudAPIError and SubscriptionRequiredError consistently
✅ Config management: Proper use of ConfigManager pattern
✅ API client pattern: Follows established make_api_request() pattern from other cloud commands
✅ Typer integration: Proper sub-command registration via snapshot_app

✅ Security & Performance

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials: Uses ConfigManager and get_authenticated_headers()
✅ Input validation: Path normalization (strips leading slashes)
✅ Authentication: Properly uses JWT token via make_api_request()

User Experience

✅ Confirmation prompts: Delete and restore ask for confirmation (can be bypassed with --force)
✅ Preview before action: Browse snapshot before restore, show details before delete
✅ Rich output: Uses rich tables and color-coded messages
✅ Helpful guidance: Suggests next commands (e.g., how to restore after browsing)

✅ Compatibility

Good

✅ Path handling: Uses lstrip("/") for path normalization (Windows compatible)
✅ No emojis in console output: Only uses rich formatting, no Unicode emojis ✓

📋 Team Checklist Results

Category	Status	Notes
Code Quality & Standards	✅	All requirements met
Testing & Documentation	⚠️	Tests excellent, but CLAUDE.md needs update
Basic Memory Architecture	✅	Follows all patterns correctly
Security & Performance	✅	No issues found
Compatibility	✅	Windows-compatible paths, no emoji issues

🔍 Specific Issues & Recommendations

1. ⚠️ CLAUDE.md Needs Update (Required)

Location: /home/runner/work/basic-memory/basic-memory/CLAUDE.md

The CLAUDE.md file lists cloud commands but doesn't include the new snapshot commands. Should be updated around line 217-220:

Current:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`

Should add:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`
- Manage snapshots: `basic-memory cloud snapshot [create|list|delete|show|browse]`
- Restore from snapshot: `basic-memory cloud restore <path> --snapshot <id>`

2. 💡 Minor Code Quality Suggestions (Optional)

a) Literate Programming Comments

The code is clean but could benefit from decision-point comments per CLAUDE.md literate programming guidelines. For example:

In restore.py:58-59 (path normalization):

# Normalize path - remove leading slash if present
normalized_path = path.lstrip("/")

Could add context:

# Trigger: User may provide paths with or without leading slashes
# Why: API expects paths without leading slash (e.g., "notes/file.md" not "/notes/file.md")
# Outcome: Consistent path format sent to API regardless of user input style
normalized_path = path.lstrip("/")

In restore.py:61-110 (confirmation logic):

if not force:
    # Show what will be restored
    ...

Could add:

# Trigger: User didn't provide --force flag
# Why: Restore overwrites existing files - user should see what will be affected
# Outcome: Preview files, show warning, require explicit confirmation
if not force:
    ...

This is optional but would align better with the literate programming style in CLAUDE.md.

b) Test Pattern Consistency

In test_snapshot_commands.py:212, there's an inline list comprehension that's a bit hard to read:

"snapshots": [
    {"id": f"snap_{i}", "name": f"snap-{i}", "auto": False, "created_at": "2024-12-24T12:00:00Z"}
    for i in range(20)
],

Minor suggestion: For test readability, could extract to a helper function or split across lines with proper formatting. But this is very minor - the test is clear as-is.

3. ✅ Excellent Practices Observed

I want to highlight several things done really well:

Truncated output for large lists (restore.py:124-133, snapshot.py:145-148): Shows first 5 files when >10 files - great UX!
Error-specific handling (restore.py:147-155): Different messages for 404 vs other errors - excellent!
Try-except around browse preview (restore.py:97-102): If browse fails, still proceeds with confirmation - smart defensive programming!
Typer.Exit re-raising (restore.py:139-141): Properly re-raises typer.Exit without modification - shows understanding of the framework!
Test call counting (test_restore_commands.py:265-298): Verifies only browse is called (not restore) when user cancels - thorough testing!

📊 Summary

Aspect	Assessment
Code Quality	Excellent - clean, well-structured, follows conventions
Test Coverage	Excellent - 25 comprehensive tests covering all scenarios
Architecture	Excellent - follows all Basic Memory patterns
Security	Excellent - no vulnerabilities, proper auth handling
UX	Excellent - helpful prompts, confirmations, rich output
Documentation	Good - needs CLAUDE.md update

✅ Recommendation

APPROVE with minor documentation update required.

This PR is ready to merge after updating CLAUDE.md to include the new snapshot commands. The code quality is excellent, tests are comprehensive, and the implementation follows all Basic Memory conventions.

The literate programming comments are optional but would be a nice enhancement for maintainability.

Great work on this implementation! 🎉

github-actions · 2025-12-27T16:22:26Z

Claude finished @phernandez's task in 2m 27s —— View job

PR Review: SPEC-29 Phase 3 Bucket Snapshot CLI

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR against the Basic Memory team checklist. Here are my findings:

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Excellent Compliance

✅ Python 3.12+ type annotations: Proper use of Optional, str, bool, int throughout
✅ 100-character line length: All files comply (snapshot.py:58, restore.py:115 are the longest at ~100 chars)
✅ Import order: Consistently follows standard lib → third-party → local imports pattern
✅ Naming conventions: Proper snake_case for functions/variables, PascalCase for exceptions
✅ Async patterns: Correct use of asyncio.run() wrapper pattern matching other cloud commands
✅ Typer conventions: Clean command structure with proper decorators, options, and arguments
✅ No commented-out code: Implementation is clean

Code Pattern Consistency

The implementation follows established patterns from core_commands.py:

Async wrapper functions inside sync commands ✅
Consistent error handling with try/except blocks ✅
Proper ConfigManager usage ✅
Standard make_api_request() calls ✅

⚠️ Testing & Documentation

Excellent Test Coverage

✅ 25 comprehensive unit tests covering:
- Success cases (create, list, delete, show, browse, restore)
- Error cases (404, 403, 500, API errors)
- Edge cases (empty results, many files, user cancellation)
- Input normalization (leading slash handling in restore.py:59)
- Output formatting (truncation for large file lists)
✅ Proper mocking: Good use of unittest.mock with Mock and AsyncMock
✅ Test organization: Clear test classes grouping related functionality

Documentation

✅ Docstrings: All commands have clear docstrings with examples
✅ Help text: Good option/argument descriptions for CLI users
⚠️ CLAUDE.md NOT updated: Previous review identified this issue - still not addressed

Required Action: CLAUDE.md lines 216-220 need updating to include the new snapshot commands.

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

Excellent Pattern Adherence

✅ Atomic operations: Each command does one thing well
✅ Consistent error handling: Uses CloudAPIError and SubscriptionRequiredError consistently
✅ Config management: Proper use of ConfigManager pattern matching other cloud commands
✅ API client pattern: Follows established make_api_request() pattern from api_client.py
✅ Typer integration: Proper sub-command registration via snapshot_app in __init__.py:11-13
✅ CLI structure: Follows the /cli/commands/cloud/ architecture pattern

✅ Security & Performance

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials: Uses ConfigManager and get_authenticated_headers()
✅ Input validation: Path normalization (strips leading slashes in restore.py:59)
✅ Authentication: Properly uses JWT token via make_api_request()
✅ No secrets in logs: Only logs safe information (snapshot IDs, descriptions, file paths)

User Experience

✅ Confirmation prompts: Delete and restore ask for confirmation (can be bypassed with --force)
✅ Preview before action: Browse snapshot before restore, show details before delete
✅ Rich output: Uses rich tables and color-coded messages
✅ Helpful guidance: Suggests next commands (e.g., snapshot.py:347-350)
✅ Truncated output: Shows first 5 files when >10 files (restore.py:124-133, snapshot.py:145-148)

Error Handling

✅ Proper exit code handling: Uses typer.Exit(0) for cancellation, typer.Exit(1) for errors
✅ Graceful degradation: Browse failure doesn't block confirmation (restore.py:97-102)
✅ Specific error messages: Different messages for 404 vs other errors (restore.py:147-155)

✅ Compatibility

Good

✅ Path handling: Uses lstrip("/") for path normalization - Windows compatible
✅ No emojis in console output: Only uses rich formatting, no Unicode emojis ✓
✅ Cross-platform commands: Uses httpx async client, no platform-specific shell commands

🔍 Comparison with Previous Review

The previous Claude review (Dec 25) identified one key issue:

Issue	Status	Notes
CLAUDE.md needs update	❌ NOT FIXED	Lines 216-220 still missing snapshot commands
Literate programming comments	N/A	Optional suggestion, not required
Test pattern consistency	N/A	Optional suggestion, not required

📋 Team Checklist Results

Category	Status	Notes
Code Quality & Standards	✅	All requirements met
Testing & Documentation	⚠️	Tests excellent, CLAUDE.md needs update
Basic Memory Architecture	✅	Follows all patterns correctly
Security & Performance	✅	No issues found
Compatibility	✅	Windows-compatible paths, no emoji issues

🎯 Recommendation

APPROVE with documentation update required.

This is excellent implementation work with:

✅ Clean, well-structured code following all Basic Memory conventions
✅ Comprehensive test coverage (25 tests covering all scenarios)
✅ Consistent architecture patterns
✅ No security vulnerabilities
✅ Great user experience with confirmations, previews, and helpful guidance

Before merge: Update CLAUDE.md (lines 216-220) to document the new snapshot commands:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`
- Manage snapshots: `basic-memory cloud snapshot [create|list|delete|show|browse]`
- Restore from snapshot: `basic-memory cloud restore <path> --snapshot <id>`

💡 Optional Enhancements (Not Required)

Per CLAUDE.md's literate programming guidelines, adding decision-point comments would improve maintainability:

Example in restore.py:58-59:

# Trigger: User may provide paths with or without leading slashes
# Why: API expects paths without leading slash (e.g., "notes/file.md" not "/notes/file.md")
# Outcome: Consistent path format sent to API regardless of user input style
normalized_path = path.lstrip("/")

Example in restore.py:61-110:

# Trigger: User didn't provide --force flag
# Why: Restore overwrites existing files - user should see what will be affected
# Outcome: Preview files, show warning, require explicit confirmation
if not force:
    ...

This is not required for approval but would align better with the codebase's documentation philosophy.

Great work on this implementation! The code quality is excellent and the test coverage is comprehensive. Just need to update CLAUDE.md and this is ready to merge. 🎉

github-actions · 2026-01-02T20:23:58Z

Claude finished @phernandez's task in 2m 37s —— View job

PR Review: SPEC-29 Phase 3 Bucket Snapshot CLI ✅

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR against the Basic Memory team checklist. This is excellent implementation work with comprehensive tests and clean code. However, the main issue from previous reviews remains unaddressed.

⚠️ Critical Issue: CLAUDE.md Still Not Updated

Status: BLOCKING

Both previous Claude reviews (Dec 25 and Dec 27) identified that CLAUDE.md needs to be updated to document the new snapshot commands. This has still not been fixed.

Location: /home/runner/work/basic-memory/basic-memory/CLAUDE.md:216-220

Current state:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`

Required update:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`
- Manage snapshots: `basic-memory cloud snapshot [create|list|delete|show|browse]`
- Restore from snapshot: `basic-memory cloud restore <path> --snapshot <id>`

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Excellent compliance across all areas:

✅ Python 3.12+ type annotations: Proper use of Optional[str], str, bool, int throughout
✅ 100-character line length: All files comply (longest lines around 100 chars)
✅ Import order: Consistently follows standard lib → third-party → local imports
- snapshot.py:6-18, restore.py:6-17
✅ Naming conventions: Proper snake_case for functions/variables, PascalCase for exceptions
✅ Async patterns: Correct use of asyncio.run() wrapper pattern matching core_commands.py
✅ Typer conventions: Clean command structure with proper decorators, options, and arguments
✅ No commented-out code: Implementation is clean throughout

Code pattern consistency:

Uses established patterns from core_commands.py ✅
Async wrapper functions inside sync commands ✅
Consistent error handling with try/except blocks ✅
Proper ConfigManager usage ✅
Standard make_api_request() calls ✅

✅ Testing & Documentation

Excellent test coverage:

✅ 25 comprehensive unit tests covering:
- Success cases (create, list, delete, show, browse, restore)
- Error cases (404, 403, 500, API errors)
- Edge cases (empty results, many files, user cancellation)
- Input normalization (leading slash handling in restore.py:59)
- Output formatting (truncation for large file lists)
✅ Proper mocking: Good use of unittest.mock with Mock and AsyncMock
✅ Test organization: Clear test classes grouping related functionality
✅ Docstrings: All commands have clear docstrings with examples
✅ Help text: Good option/argument descriptions for CLI users

Documentation issues:

❌ CLAUDE.md NOT updated: Lines 216-220 still missing snapshot commands (BLOCKING)

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

Excellent pattern adherence:

✅ Atomic operations: Each command does one thing well
✅ Consistent error handling: Uses CloudAPIError and SubscriptionRequiredError consistently
✅ Config management: Proper use of ConfigManager pattern matching other cloud commands
✅ API client pattern: Follows established make_api_request() pattern from api_client.py
✅ Typer integration: Proper sub-command registration via snapshot_app in __init__.py:11-13
✅ CLI structure: Follows the /cli/commands/cloud/ architecture pattern
✅ No database changes: No Alembic migrations needed (cloud-only feature)

✅ Security & Performance

Security:

✅ No hardcoded credentials: Uses ConfigManager and get_authenticated_headers()
✅ Input validation: Path normalization (strips leading slashes in restore.py:59)
✅ Authentication: Properly uses JWT token via make_api_request()
✅ No secrets in logs: Only logs safe information (snapshot IDs, descriptions, file paths)

User Experience:

✅ Confirmation prompts: Delete and restore ask for confirmation (can be bypassed with --force)
✅ Preview before action: Browse snapshot before restore, show details before delete
✅ Rich output: Uses rich tables and color-coded messages
✅ Helpful guidance: Suggests next commands (e.g., snapshot.py:347-350)
✅ Truncated output: Shows first 5 files when >10 files (restore.py:124-133, snapshot.py:145-148)

Error Handling:

✅ Proper exit code handling: Uses typer.Exit(0) for cancellation, typer.Exit(1) for errors
✅ Graceful degradation: Browse failure doesn't block confirmation (restore.py:97-102)
✅ Specific error messages: Different messages for 404 vs other errors (restore.py:147-155)
✅ typer.Exit re-raising: Properly re-raises typer.Exit without modification (restore.py:139-141, snapshot.py:224-226)

✅ Compatibility

✅ Path handling: Uses lstrip("/") for path normalization - Windows compatible
✅ No emojis in console output: Only uses rich formatting, no Unicode emojis
✅ Cross-platform commands: Uses httpx async client, no platform-specific shell commands

📋 Team Checklist Results

Category	Status	Notes
Code Quality & Standards	✅	All requirements met
Testing & Documentation	⚠️	Tests excellent, CLAUDE.md needs update (BLOCKING)
Basic Memory Architecture	✅	Follows all patterns correctly
Security & Performance	✅	No issues found
Compatibility	✅	Windows-compatible paths, no emoji issues

🎯 Recommendation

REQUEST CHANGES - Documentation update required before merge.

This is excellent implementation work with:

✅ Clean, well-structured code following all Basic Memory conventions
✅ Comprehensive test coverage (25 tests covering all scenarios)
✅ Consistent architecture patterns
✅ No security vulnerabilities
✅ Great user experience with confirmations, previews, and helpful guidance

However, the CLAUDE.md documentation issue identified in both previous reviews (Dec 25 and Dec 27) has still not been addressed. This needs to be fixed before merge.

Required action: Update CLAUDE.md lines 216-220 to include the new snapshot and restore commands as shown in the "Critical Issue" section above.

💡 Optional Enhancements (Not Required for Approval)

Per CLAUDE.md's literate programming guidelines (lines 70-116), adding decision-point comments would improve maintainability:

Example in restore.py:58-59:

# Trigger: User may provide paths with or without leading slashes
# Why: API expects paths without leading slash (e.g., "notes/file.md" not "/notes/file.md")
# Outcome: Consistent path format sent to API regardless of user input style
normalized_path = path.lstrip("/")

Example in restore.py:61-110:

# Trigger: User didn't provide --force flag
# Why: Restore overwrites existing files - user should see what will be affected
# Outcome: Preview files, show warning, require explicit confirmation
if not force:
    ...

This is optional and not required for approval, but would align better with the literate programming style documented in CLAUDE.md.

⭐ Excellent Practices Observed

I want to highlight several things done really well:

Truncated output for large lists (restore.py:124-133, snapshot.py:145-148): Shows first 5 files when >10 files - excellent UX!
Error-specific handling (restore.py:147-155): Different messages for 404 vs other errors - very thorough!
Try-except around browse preview (restore.py:97-102): If browse fails, still proceeds with confirmation - smart defensive programming!
typer.Exit re-raising (restore.py:139-141, snapshot.py:224-226): Properly re-raises typer.Exit without modification - shows deep understanding of the framework!
Test call counting (test_restore_commands.py:265-298): Verifies only browse is called (not restore) when user cancels - very thorough testing!

Summary: Fix the CLAUDE.md documentation issue and this is ready to merge. Great work! 🎉

github-actions · 2026-01-03T16:36:47Z

Claude finished @phernandez's task in 2m 18s —— View job

PR Review: SPEC-29 Phase 3 Bucket Snapshot CLI

I've completed a comprehensive review of this PR against the Basic Memory team checklist. This is excellent implementation work with clean code and comprehensive tests. However, the critical documentation issue from all three previous reviews remains unaddressed.

⚠️ Critical Issue: CLAUDE.md NOT Updated (BLOCKING)

Status: BLOCKING MERGE

All three previous Claude reviews (Dec 25, Dec 27, Jan 2) identified that CLAUDE.md must be updated to document the new snapshot commands. This still has not been fixed.

Location: /home/runner/work/basic-memory/basic-memory/CLAUDE.md:216-220

Current state:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`

Required addition:

**Cloud Commands (requires subscription):**
- Authenticate: `basic-memory cloud login`
- Logout: `basic-memory cloud logout`
- Check cloud status: `basic-memory cloud status`
- Setup cloud sync: `basic-memory cloud setup`
- Manage snapshots: `basic-memory cloud snapshot [create|list|delete|show|browse]`
- Restore from snapshot: `basic-memory cloud restore <path> --snapshot <id>`

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Excellent compliance across all requirements:

Python 3.12+ Standards

✅ Type annotations: Proper use of Optional[str], str, bool, int throughout
✅ Line length: All files comply with 100-character limit
✅ Import order: Consistently follows standard lib → third-party → local imports pattern
- snapshot.py:6-18, restore.py:6-17 ✓
✅ Naming conventions: Proper snake_case for functions, PascalCase for classes
✅ No commented-out code: Clean implementation

Typer Conventions

✅ Command structure: Clean decorators, proper options and arguments
✅ Help text: Clear, helpful descriptions with examples
✅ Sub-command registration: Proper use of snapshot_app in __init__.py:11-13

Async Patterns

✅ asyncio.run() wrapper: Matches pattern from core_commands.py
✅ Error handling: Comprehensive try/except blocks with proper exit codes

Code Consistency

✅ ConfigManager usage: Follows established pattern
✅ API client pattern: Consistent use of make_api_request()
✅ Error exceptions: Proper use of CloudAPIError and SubscriptionRequiredError

✅ Testing & Documentation

Excellent Test Coverage

25 comprehensive unit tests covering:

Snapshot Commands (test_snapshot_commands.py):

✅ Create success/error cases
✅ List snapshots (success, empty, many snapshots)
✅ Delete with confirmation and errors
✅ Show snapshot details
✅ Browse snapshot contents with prefix filtering
✅ Subscription and API error handling

Restore Commands (test_restore_commands.py):

✅ File and folder restoration
✅ Force flag handling
✅ User confirmation flow
✅ Preview before restore
✅ Large file list truncation
✅ Error cases (404, API errors, cancellation)

Test Quality:

✅ Proper mocking with Mock and AsyncMock
✅ Clear test organization by command
✅ Edge case coverage (empty results, user cancellation, input normalization)

Documentation

✅ Docstrings: All commands have clear docstrings with examples
✅ Help text: Good CLI option/argument descriptions
❌ CLAUDE.md: NOT updated (BLOCKING - see above)

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

Excellent pattern adherence:

✅ Atomic operations: Each command does one focused task
✅ CLI structure: Follows /cli/commands/cloud/ architecture
✅ Config management: Proper use of ConfigManager pattern
✅ API client pattern: Follows make_api_request() from api_client.py
✅ Typer integration: Proper sub-app registration
✅ No database changes: No Alembic migrations needed (cloud-only feature)
✅ Local-first preserved: Cloud-only commands don't affect local operations

✅ Security & Performance

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials: Uses ConfigManager and get_authenticated_headers()
✅ Input validation: Path normalization (restore.py:59 strips leading slashes)
✅ Authentication: JWT token via make_api_request()
✅ No secrets in logs: Only logs safe information

User Experience Excellence

✅ Confirmation prompts: Delete and restore require confirmation (bypass with --force)
✅ Preview before action: Browse snapshot before restore (restore.py:67-102)
✅ Rich output: Uses rich tables and color-coded messages
✅ Helpful guidance: Suggests next commands (snapshot.py:347-350)
✅ Truncated output: Shows first 5 files when >10 files (restore.py:124-133, snapshot.py:145-148)
✅ Overwrite warnings: Clear warnings about file overwrite (restore.py:104-106)

Error Handling

✅ Proper exit codes: Uses typer.Exit(0) for cancellation, typer.Exit(1) for errors
✅ Graceful degradation: Browse failure doesn't block confirmation (restore.py:97-102)
✅ Specific error messages: Different messages for 404 vs other errors (restore.py:147-155)
✅ typer.Exit re-raising: Properly re-raises without modification (restore.py:139-141, snapshot.py:224-226)

✅ Compatibility

✅ Path handling: Uses lstrip("/") for Windows compatibility
✅ No emojis: Only uses rich formatting, no Unicode emojis in console output
✅ Cross-platform: Uses httpx async client, no platform-specific commands

📋 Team Checklist Results

Category	Status	Notes
Code Quality & Standards	✅	All requirements met
Testing & Documentation	⚠️	Tests excellent, CLAUDE.md NOT updated (BLOCKING)
Basic Memory Architecture	✅	Follows all patterns correctly
Security & Performance	✅	No issues, excellent UX
Compatibility	✅	Windows-compatible, no emoji issues

🎯 Recommendation

REQUEST CHANGES - Documentation update required before merge

This is excellent implementation work:

✅ Clean, well-structured code following all Basic Memory conventions
✅ Comprehensive test coverage (25 tests covering all scenarios)
✅ Consistent architecture patterns
✅ No security vulnerabilities
✅ Excellent user experience with confirmations, previews, and helpful guidance
✅ Proper error handling and exit codes

However, the CLAUDE.md documentation issue identified in all three previous reviews (Dec 25, Dec 27, Jan 2) must be addressed before merge.

Required action: Update CLAUDE.md lines 216-220 to include the new snapshot and restore commands as shown in the "Critical Issue" section above.

💡 Optional Enhancement (Not Required for Approval)

Per CLAUDE.md's literate programming guidelines (lines 70-116), adding decision-point comments would improve maintainability. This is optional and not blocking:

Example in restore.py:58-59:

# Trigger: User may provide paths with or without leading slashes
# Why: API expects paths without leading slash (e.g., "notes/file.md" not "/notes/file.md")
# Outcome: Consistent path format sent to API regardless of user input style
normalized_path = path.lstrip("/")

Example in restore.py:61-110:

# Trigger: User didn't provide --force flag
# Why: Restore overwrites existing files - user should see what will be affected
# Outcome: Preview files, show warning, require explicit confirmation
if not force:
    ...

⭐ Excellent Practices Worth Highlighting

Smart output truncation (restore.py:124-133, snapshot.py:145-148): Shows first 5 files when >10 - great UX!
Error-specific handling (restore.py:147-155): Different messages for 404 vs other errors - very thorough!
Defensive programming (restore.py:97-102): Browse failure doesn't block the restore flow - smart!
Framework understanding (restore.py:139-141, snapshot.py:224-226): Properly re-raises typer.Exit - shows deep understanding!
Thorough testing (test_restore_commands.py:265-298): Verifies only browse is called when user cancels - excellent test coverage!

Summary: Fix the CLAUDE.md documentation issue and this is ready to merge. Great work on the implementation! 🎉

Merge branch 'main' into feature/spec-29-phase-3-snapshot-cli

61a8276

Merge branch 'main' into feature/spec-29-phase-3-snapshot-cli

06c24ab

Merge branch 'main' into feature/spec-29-phase-3-snapshot-cli

a8dbbc6

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

feat: add SPEC-29 Phase 3 bucket snapshot CLI commands #476

feat: add SPEC-29 Phase 3 bucket snapshot CLI commands #476

phernandez commented Dec 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Dec 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Dec 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

feat: add SPEC-29 Phase 3 bucket snapshot CLI commands #476

Are you sure you want to change the base?

feat: add SPEC-29 Phase 3 bucket snapshot CLI commands #476

Conversation

phernandez commented Dec 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Commands Added

Test plan

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Dec 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Complete ✅

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Excellent

Observations

✅ Testing & Documentation

Excellent Test Coverage

Documentation

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

Excellent Patterns

✅ Security & Performance

Security

User Experience

✅ Compatibility

Good

📋 Team Checklist Results

🔍 Specific Issues & Recommendations

1. ⚠️ CLAUDE.md Needs Update (Required)

2. 💡 Minor Code Quality Suggestions (Optional)

a) Literate Programming Comments

b) Test Pattern Consistency

3. ✅ Excellent Practices Observed

📊 Summary

✅ Recommendation

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Dec 27, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review: SPEC-29 Phase 3 Bucket Snapshot CLI

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Excellent Compliance

Code Pattern Consistency

⚠️ Testing & Documentation

Excellent Test Coverage

Documentation

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

Excellent Pattern Adherence

✅ Security & Performance

Security

User Experience

Error Handling

✅ Compatibility

Good

🔍 Comparison with Previous Review

📋 Team Checklist Results

🎯 Recommendation

💡 Optional Enhancements (Not Required)

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review: SPEC-29 Phase 3 Bucket Snapshot CLI ✅

⚠️ Critical Issue: CLAUDE.md Still Not Updated

✅ Code Quality & Standards

✅ Testing & Documentation

✅ Basic Memory Architecture

✅ Security & Performance

✅ Compatibility

📋 Team Checklist Results

🎯 Recommendation

💡 Optional Enhancements (Not Required for Approval)

⭐ Excellent Practices Observed

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review: SPEC-29 Phase 3 Bucket Snapshot CLI

⚠️ Critical Issue: CLAUDE.md NOT Updated (BLOCKING)

✅ Code Quality & Standards

Python 3.12+ Standards

Typer Conventions

Async Patterns

phernandez commented Dec 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Dec 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2026 •

edited

Loading