Update nw_rate & mc_rate to int unsigned to allow rates > 65Gbps

[Pearl1594]

Description

This PR fixes: #13355

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 18.93%. Comparing base (d2c8aa7) to head (2d6d937).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #13380      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     18.93%   18.93%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    18471    18476       +5     
============================================
  Files          6221     6221              
  Lines        560045   560088      +43     
  Branches      68289    68288       -1     
============================================
+ Hits         106048   106054       +6     
- Misses       442372   442410      +38     
+ Partials      11625    11624       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.50% <ø> (ø)
unittests	20.14% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[weizhouapache]

code lgtm

I just wonder if the sql is in correct uprgade file.
if we release 4.23.0 now, the changes will not apply to 4.23.0 users.
I think we should avoid sql changes of minor releases, especially when a new major version is released.

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-16453)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 49130 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr13380-t16453-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 151 look OK, 0 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

[weizhouapache]

code lgtm

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric	Value
Line coverage	23.57%
Branch coverage	17.80%

Grade Scale

Grade	Line Coverage	Meaning
🟢 A	≥ 80%	Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B	60-79%	Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C	40-59%	Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D	20-39%	Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F	< 20%	Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 18471

[harikrishna-patnala]

LGTM