Skip to content

Conversation

@ORybak5
Copy link
Contributor

@ORybak5 ORybak5 commented Jan 22, 2026

What

Similar tests with boilerplate code were refactored into parametric ones

Why

Parametric tests are more concise if there is a lot of similar boilerplate code

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Internal change (non-breaking change with no effect on the functionality affecting end users)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have updated the Changelog with details of my change in the UNRELEASED section if this change will affect end users
  • A corresponding change has been made to the Mapping Documentation repository

@github-actions
Copy link

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
See https://pitest.org

@github-actions
Copy link

Images built and published to ECR using a Build Id of PR-939-f225db8

@ORybak5 ORybak5 marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2026 11:02
@ORybak5 ORybak5 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2026 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant