Skip to content

fix(deps): pin esbuild >=0.28.1 (Dependabot GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#63

Merged
GeiserX merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/esbuild-cve
Jun 14, 2026
Merged

fix(deps): pin esbuild >=0.28.1 (Dependabot GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr)#63
GeiserX merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/esbuild-cve

Conversation

@GeiserX

@GeiserX GeiserX commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Dependabot flagged esbuild (resolved transitively to 0.28.0) for two advisories, both patched in 0.28.1:

  • GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (HIGH) — missing binary integrity verification in the Deno module enables RCE via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY
  • GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr (low) — arbitrary file read via the dev server on Windows

Added an overrides entry forcing esbuild ^0.28.1 (consistent with the repo's existing transitive pins for hono/fast-uri/postcss/brace-expansion). esbuild is build/dev tooling only — not a runtime dependency (pulled by Prisma, lightningcss/tailwind, vitest, testcontainers).

Verification

  • package-lock.json now resolves esbuild to 0.28.1 everywhere (0 entries below)
  • npm audit0 vulnerabilities
  • runtime resolves esbuild 0.28.1; tsc clean; 533 tests pass; next build ok

These were the only two open Dependabot alerts on the repo; this clears both.

esbuild resolved transitively to 0.28.0, vulnerable to two advisories patched
in 0.28.1: GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr (HIGH — missing binary integrity verification
in the Deno module enables RCE via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY) and GHSA-g7r4-m6w7-qqqr
(low — arbitrary file read via the dev server on Windows). Add an overrides
entry forcing esbuild ^0.28.1; npm audit now reports 0 vulnerabilities. esbuild
is build/dev tooling only (not a runtime dependency).
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@GeiserX, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 45 minutes and 41 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 545b71d7-0899-47b5-a6b3-4d8aeb3760d0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0b0ef9 and 831872c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json, !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/esbuild-cve

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@GeiserX GeiserX merged commit c501843 into main Jun 14, 2026
8 checks passed
@GeiserX GeiserX deleted the fix/esbuild-cve branch June 14, 2026 19:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant