Skip to content

refactor: move ohsomedb interactions to own module #976

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
matthiasschaub merged 4 commits into from
Dec 22, 2025
Merged

refactor: move ohsomedb interactions to own module #976

matthiasschaub merged 4 commits into from
Dec 22, 2025

Conversation

@matthiasschaub
Copy link
Member

@matthiasschaub matthiasschaub commented Dec 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

  • Port over user activity indicator
  • Tests of ohsomedb module should define its own fixtures to be more independent
  • Check jinja2 async capabilities. Is it necessary to use async/await pattern with jinja?
  • Address build failure due to recent changes of ruff rules (LOG)

@matthiasschaub matthiasschaub changed the title Ohsomedb client refactor: move ohsomedb interactions to own module Dec 18, 2025
@matthiasschaub matthiasschaub marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2025 13:51
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 22, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@matthiasschaub matthiasschaub merged commit fb8f7ee into main Dec 22, 2025
3 checks passed
@matthiasschaub matthiasschaub deleted the ohsomedb-client branch December 22, 2025 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Hagellach37 Hagellach37 Awaiting requested review from Hagellach37

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@matthiasschaub