FFL-1642 docs: upgrade example to use latest expo setup#96
Merged
dd-oleksii merged 1 commit intomainfrom Jan 8, 2026
Merged
Conversation
7bd3958 to
42b435f
Compare
leoromanovsky
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2026
42b435f to
341acfa
Compare
341acfa to
9eea236
Compare
dd-oleksii
commented
Jan 8, 2026
| "exclude": [ | ||
| "node_modules", | ||
| "dist", | ||
| "example" |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
top-level tsc was trying to type-check example and failed because it doesn't know about the dependencies. excluding that directory here
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Eppo Internal:
🎟️ Fixes FFL-1642
Motivation and Context
The old example app was outdated and had a vulnerability. It needed to be migrated to a modern Expo setup.
Description
EXPO_PUBLIC_EPPO_API_KEY)How has this been documented?
Updated
example/README.mdwith:How has this been tested?
Tested that example still works.