docs(benchmarks): add Independent benchmarks section#460
Merged
Conversation
github-actions Bot
pushed a commit
to harshav167/ponytail
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2026
) Curated, plugin-installed third-party runs (KuldeepB19, RicardoCostaGit) with method, headline, and date, clearly framed as independent corroboration not official figures. Gives the recurring 'did anyone independent check this?' ask a canonical home. Closes DietrichGebert#121 Closes DietrichGebert#236
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds an Independent benchmarks section to
benchmarks/README.md: a curated table of third-party runs with method, headline result, and date, framed clearly as independent corroboration rather than official figures.Two rows, both plugin-installed runs only (pasted-prompt runs approximate
fulland skew results, so they're excluded):Gives the recurring 'did anyone independent check this?' ask a canonical home, and credits/links both authors (both granted permission in-thread).
Closes #121
Closes #236
Note: overlaps #122 (which credits/links Ricardo only). This supersedes it by also adding Kuldeep and the framing/curation rule. Suggest closing #122 in favor of this, or I can rework it the other way if you prefer.