Skip to content

Conversation

@aresnik11
Copy link
Contributor

@aresnik11 aresnik11 commented Jan 13, 2026

Overview

Bumps yarn to 4.12.0. This includes changes from #3219 where I bumped to 3.8.7 first.

PR Checklist

  • Related to designs:
  • Related to JIRA ticket: GMT-1476
  • I have run this code to verify it works
  • This PR includes unit tests for the code change
  • This PR includes testing instructions tests for the code change
  • The alpha package of this PR is passing end-to-end tests in all relevant Codecademy repositories

Testing Instructions

  1. Go to storybook preview
  2. Confirm everything works as expected
  3. Pull the branch locally
  4. Go to storybook
  5. Confirm everything works as expected
  6. Confirm the alpha works in mono/lith
  7. Finish and do a celebratory dance

PR Links and Envs

Repository PR Link
Monolith Monolith PR
Mono Mono PR

@aresnik11 aresnik11 changed the base branch from main to ajr-yarn-3 January 13, 2026 20:40
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jan 13, 2026

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit da26215


☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-01-14 18:22:09 UTC

@aresnik11 aresnik11 marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 21:26
@aresnik11 aresnik11 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2026 21:26
@aresnik11 aresnik11 requested review from jakemhiller and sh0ji and removed request for a team January 13, 2026 21:26
@aresnik11 aresnik11 marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2026 21:26
@aresnik11 aresnik11 changed the base branch from ajr-yarn-3 to main January 13, 2026 21:27
@codecademydev
Copy link
Collaborator

📬 Published Alpha Packages:

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@aresnik11 aresnik11 changed the title Ajr yarn 4 build: bump yarn to 4.12.0 Jan 14, 2026
@aresnik11 aresnik11 marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2026 15:33
]
},
"packageManager": "yarn@1.22.10",
"packageManager": "yarn@4.12.0+sha512.f45ab632439a67f8bc759bf32ead036a1f413287b9042726b7cc4818b7b49e14e9423ba49b18f9e06ea4941c1ad062385b1d8760a8d5091a1a31e5f6219afca8",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think the sha here isn't necessary now that we're using corepack. probably doesn't make a difference but it's not in my monolith PR so we could just be consistent.

Copy link
Member

@jakemhiller jakemhiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants