[IMPROVEMENT] Draft: Coverage report for containers and caption types #1001
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
3 tasks
03-SudheshnaReddy
requested review from
canihavesomecoffee and
thealphadollar
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the recent work on sample inventory and the stated goal of strengthening regression confidence, this draft introduces a small, read-only coverage report built on top of the inventory.
The report summarizes:
The intent is to make coverage gaps explicit (e.g. missing caption types in certain containers) so that a minimal but comprehensive regression suite can be selected systematically before further refactors.
This does not change any existing behavior and is meant as an exploratory tool.
Feedback on scope, output format, or placement is very welcome.