|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +date: '2025-11-03' |
| 3 | +title: How India’s tax structure rewards growth over profits |
| 4 | +tags: [taxation,startups,business,investing] |
| 5 | +author: nithin |
| 6 | +link: https://x.com/Nithin0dha/status/1985316723533435191 |
| 7 | +post_type: tweet |
| 8 | +description: The math is simple... |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +--- |
| 11 | +If you take money out of a business as dividends, the effective tax rate is 52% (25% corporate tax + 35.5% on personal income). Through capital gains, it’s just 14.95% (with cess). |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +Why does this matter? Here’s what you should know if you invest in IPOs. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +If you’re an investor (especially a VC), the math is simple: reduce corporate tax by showing minimal profits or losses. Spend (Burn) on acquiring users, build a growth narrative, and then sell shares at a higher valuation while paying much lower tax. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +This spending also makes it harder for competitors to survive. To be clear, we’re not discussing R&D spending here, which, incidentally, is very low in India (0.7% of GDP). |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +What’s often overlooked is that VCs are essentially playing a tax arbitrage game. Look at most VC-backed businesses listed in the last few years, the reason they show little or no profit is partly due to this. Once you run a business this way, it’s extremely difficult to switch. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +Every startup that’s 7-8 years old from the time of raising the first round faces constant pressure from VCs for an exit. With almost no M&A opportunities in India, IPO is often the only way out. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +The government probably designed this tax arbitrage to incentivize companies to spend money and not just accumulate and distribute. But I’m unsure if the balance is correct. I think it’s also creating businesses that aren’t very resilient. One prolonged market downturn, and many of these unprofitable companies would struggle to survive. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +Two things that make this more interesting: |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +Unprofitable growth gets valued at much higher multiples than steady profits. A company doing ₹100 cr revenue with 100% growth might get 10-15x, while a profitable one with 20% growth gets 3-5x. So VCs aren’t just saving on tax; they’re in essence creating a 3x higher exit valuation. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +If you’re competing against someone burning cash, you almost have to match it to defend market share, even if you don’t want to, because of the quirks I mentioned above. |
0 commit comments