I see Wireguard, can Tailscale be supported? #233
Replies: 6 comments 9 replies
-
|
tailscale works, but the binaries are huge, exceeding the total capacity of the onboard flash storage chips. you can download the binaries to an sd card and run it from there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@gtxaspec - Obviously it's still hefty, but looks like the tailscale docs claim to get the binary down to ~5mb https://tailscale.com/kb/1207/small-tailscale Do you know if their suggestions were used when you tested the binary in these commits, or did you just want to avoid the idea of a packer completely for all the reasons? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
i can add the package back into the repo compressed, but it's still too big to include enabled by default obviously. if you compile your own build, which is very easy, you'll be able to include it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
added back in: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I got this working with a patch to the package defs: Think there was a typo. However, tailscaled keeps getting killed due to OOM. I worked around this with a custom launcher that would respawn on non-zero exit, but seems pretty spotty, so I went back to vanilla wireguard. Is there a way to reduce memory usage? I'm running pretty much stock firmware + tailscale on a wyze cam v3. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am thoroughly confused. No matter where I add I'd also like to be able to disable Telegram, since I never use that and it can save some memory. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Tailscale is based on Wireguard but makes setup even easier. Would adding Tailscale be possible? It's able to run on routers so hopefully the processor wouldn't be an issue.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions