Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
@olivierlacan , any opinion on this ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I agree this would be useful, but I think it would be MUCH better for consistency if the format was: This way entries without a title can be displayed along side entries with titles and the elements will be side-by-side: Tangential issue, I don't really see the need for the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello, and thanks for the great work !
If I'm not mistaken, it seems that the format you propose is missing a key part : the release title.
Note how your own releases contain one 😉 :
Could we consider having an optional title in each changelog section, between the version number and the date ?
meaning that both
[1.1.1] - 2023-03-05
AND
[1.1.1] - More betterness (2023-03-05)
would be supported.
Thanks ! (and sorry if this was already reported, my bad)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions