Inconsistent "Points to Service" and "Enhanced Filtering" Judgments

[yutafuji-ms]

Hi ORCA team,

I've noticed a discrepancy in the "Domains are pointed directly at EOP or enhanced filtering is used" section of the ORCA report.

For example:

• example-domain-a.com is correctly marked as "Points to Service: No" and "Enhanced Filtering: Not Configured".
• However, example-domain-b.com is marked as "Points to Service: Yes", even though its MX record does not point to EOP (verified via nslookup).
• Additionally, both domains are covered by the same connector configuration with Enhanced Filtering enabled, yet ORCA reports "Not Configured" for example-domain-a.com and "Not Required" for example-domain-b.com.

This seems inconsistent. Could you clarify:

1. What exact logic ORCA uses to determine "Points to Service"?
2. How Enhanced Filtering status is evaluated—especially when multiple domains share the same connector?

Thank you for your support!